On 2015-02-17 15:41:45 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> 15.01.2015, 21:58, Robert Haas kirjoitti:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >> I think I'd for now simply not define pg_attribute_aligned() on
> >> platforms where it's not supported, instead of defining it empty. If we
> >> need a softer variant we can name it pg_attribute_aligned_if_possible or
> >> something.
> >>
> >> Sounds sane?
> >
> > Yes, that sounds like a much better plan.
>
> Attached an updated patch rebased on today's git master that never
> defines aligned or packed empty.
Cool, that looks good. Besides allowing other compilers to use the
__attribute__ stuff, it also seems like a readability win to
me. Especially the various printf stuff looks much better to me this
way.
I guess you've tested this on solaris and x86 linux?
Greetings,
Andres Freund