Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs?
Дата
Msg-id
20130330143112.GC12134@momjian.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? 赖文豫 <xiaolai913@gmail.com>
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>
Re: By now, why PostgreSQL 9.2 don't support SSDs? Ants Aasma <ants.aasma@eesti.ee>
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:08:44PM +0800, 赖文豫 wrote: > As we know, SSDs are widely used in various kinds of applications. But the SMGR > in PostgreSQL still only > support magnetic disk. How do we make full use of SSDs to improve the > performance of PostgreSQL? When the storage manager (SMGR) says magnetic disk, it is talking about read/write media with random access capabillity, vs. something like write-only media, which was originally supported in the code. Postgres works just fine with SSDs; the only adjustment you might want to make is to reduce random_page_cost. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления