Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified precision NUMERIC has a very high r
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified
precision NUMERIC has a very high r
Дата
Msg-id
201104261728.p3QHS5M12508@momjian.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified precision NUMERIC has a very high
r Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified precision
NUMERIC has a very high r Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified
precision NUMERIC has a very high r Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified precision
NUMERIC has a very high r Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified precision NUMERIC has a very high r Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pgsql: Clarify that a non-specified
precision NUMERIC has a very high r Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Clarify that a non-specified precision NUMERIC has a very high range.
>
> This is entirely redundant. You've added "(when the precision is not
> specified)" but that's exactly what the word "otherwise" already
> conveys.
Right, but the old wording was:
otherwise the current implementation of the NUMERIC
is subject to the limits described in .
I removed the extra "the", and I didn't think people were clear you
could just specify NUMERIC alone. We know you can you can do things
like VARCHAR, but others will probably not realize it so I wanted to
explicity mention it. Other wording?
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
От: Robert Haas
Дата: