Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> If we're going to go down this path, why would we not put the
> >> "reference" typedef list into CVS?
>
> > Uh, I assume we don't want an automated system updating the file in CVS.
>
> Nowhere did I suggest that. What I suggested is that the "considered
> good" reference list should be in CVS, not on some random wiki page.
> In particular there's something pretty broken about the idea of a file
> in CVS telling people to go to a wiki page for important data.
I have no problem using a URL to pull down the typedef list via wget.
How is that CVS file going to be updated? Is someone manually going to
update it in CVS, and how often?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +