Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera  writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>> I think the agreement was that dblink_current_query was to be
> >>> implemented on top of this.  In fact I don't see any reason not to.
> >> 
> >> Really?  It seemed like just duplicate functionality.
> 
> > It's called "backwards compatibility".  The nice thing about it is that
> > it doesn't cost us any extra code.
> 
> Indeed.  It's just silly to break dblink users when there's no need.

OK.  Did someone mention this before because I don't remember it and the
patch removed the dblink usage.  Do we continue to document the
function?

--  Bruce Momjian          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +