Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> ohp@pyrenet.fr wrote:
>
> >In the meantime would'nt it be nice to try to understand what happens and
> >correct it?
> >
> >I'm a bit afraid that 8.1 is not used on unixware because people don't
> >have/want the patch installed.
> >
> >
> >
>
> All the evidence is that this is a compiler bug. The apparent workaround
> for now would be to compile with optimisation turned off. Or use another
> compiler - gcc is available isn't it?
The SCO compiler was a buggy mess with any optimization turned on 10
years ago, and it still is. I see no reason our community should waste
time helping fix such a buggy compiler. If it was buggy for the past 10
years, I think it will be buggy for the next 10 too. We should just
turn off optimization for that compiler.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073