Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Ed L.
Тема
Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED
Дата
Msg-id
200302101507.12449.pggeneral@bluepolka.net
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
7.3.1: test select_having ... FAILED "Ed L." <pggeneral@bluepolka.net>
Re: 7.3.1: test select_having ... FAILED Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3.1: test select_having ... FAILED "Ed L." <pggeneral@bluepolka.net>
Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED "Ed L." <pggeneral@bluepolka.net>
Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED "Ed L." <pggeneral@bluepolka.net>
Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: 7.3.2: test select_having ... FAILED "Ed L." <pggeneral@bluepolka.net>
On Monday February 10 2003 1:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Ed L."  writes:
> > The select_having regression test fails pg 7.3.2 just as it did
> > in 7.3.1.  Upon inspection, the 7.3.2 code (select_having.sql)
> > does not include the "ORDER BY" clauses needed to pass the test.
>
> You're missing the point: ORDER BY does not fix this, because the
> problem is that the ordering is different in the locale you're
> using.

Then my locale would need to match the locale in which the expected 
test result was created in order to give the test result validity?

What was the locale in which the expected results were created?

What was the point of your addition of ORDER BY clauses in rev 1.8?

Thanks,
Ed

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Francisco Reyes
Дата:
От: Richard Welty
Дата:
Сообщение: arrays and pl/pgsql?
FAQ