Re: Solaris Performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Solaris Performance
Дата
Msg-id
200202042051.g14Kp6V12579@candle.pha.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Solaris Performance "Kelly McTiernan" <kelly.mctiernan@verizon.net>
Tom Lane wrote:
> "P.J. \"Josh\" Rovero"  writes:
> > We've been running equivalent configurations and schema on
> > HP-UX, Solaris, and x86 Linux, and benchmarking with
> > pgbench and some application-specific data.  All testing
> > was with 7.2rc2, and all were built natively on each platform.
> 
> > Performance on Solaris (2.6 and 2.7) seems lackluster,
> 
> Seeing as how those are three different hardware platforms, one must
> wonder how sure you are that you are comparing apples to apples.
> A difference in CPU speed or disk speed could explain everything.

Agreed, but if I had to take a guess, my bet is he is going to say the
Solaris box is faster in all ways.  We have heard such reports before.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Solaris Performance
От: P.J. \Josh\ Rovero
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Solaris Performance
FAQ