Re: Tuple size limits and upgrading

On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 10:36:20AM -0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> like to bump this up to at least 256K, although 512K would be nice. This is
> for the purpose of storing large text fields, although it's usefulness
If you don't need make index on this text field, and indexing BIG text
is not very good, you can store big text into BLOB
> might be extended for storing binary data as well (e.g. large images).
For binary data use BLOBs

-- 
Igor' Robul', Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga", 
Sochi, Russia
http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744