Re: Aggregates, group, and order by
От
Michael Glaesemann
Тема
Re: Aggregates, group, and order by
Дата
Msg-id
175BE1EB-3022-4C4F-96DB-4A9F3FAF455A@myrealbox.com
Ответ на
Re: Aggregates, group, and order by (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Aggregates, group, and order by "Roger Hand" <RHand@kailea.com>
Re: Aggregates, group, and order by Michael Glaesemann <grzm@myrealbox.com>
On Nov 7, 2005, at 23:24 , Tom Lane wrote: > Strictly speaking, you need this: > > select bar_id, array_accum(foo_value) from > (select * from ordered_foo order by bar_id, foo_pos) as ss > group by bar_id order by bar_id; > > ie, sort the subselect by the grouping key of the outer query, then > by the thing that should control the aggregation order within groups. > > The way Joe shows will work only if the planner chooses to use a hash > aggregate plan. If it chooses a sort/uniq aggregation plan, the re- > sort > will destroy the sort order of the sub-select's output. Thanks, Tom. That fixed the problem in the production version. Is the ability to do this an artifact of the sorting or defined by the SQL? I.e., can I expect this to work even if the plan changes? I'm guessing not, but that's just a guess. Michael Glaesemann grzm myrealbox com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления