Re: bug or simply not enough stack space?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space?
Дата
Msg-id
12939.1247944666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
bug or simply not enough stack space? Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Frank van Vugt <ftm.van.vugt@foxi.nl>
Re: bug or simply not enough stack space? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [BUGS] bug or simply not enough stack space? Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Re: [BUGS] bug or simply not enough stack space? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Frank van Vugt  writes:
>> I think I might have been overenthusiastic in trying to free resources
>> during a subtransaction abort.  Try this patch and see if you notice
>> any bad side-effects.

> All examples I had that crashed and burned, now work correctly and/or bail out 
> correctly where needed.

> No side-effects noticed.

Well, it had some :-(.  I've committed a better version of that patch,
which will be in 8.4.1.  However, if you're not seeing any serious
memory leakage then you could keep using the patch you have for the
time being.

			regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Дата:
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
FAQ