"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Is there a hash opclass for the type? 8.4 can group types that have
>> hash but not btree opclasses, but prior versions insisted on btree.
> Well I sure didn't create one. I've only been attempting to create a
> btree opclass. Is there some kind of default hash opclass for
> composites?
No ... but after poking around in the system catalogs I notice there
*is* a default btree opclass for composites, as of 8.4 ...
regards, tom lane