Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output
Дата
Msg-id
12368.1184596099@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output (Andrew Dunstan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message
output Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: write_pipe_chunks patch messes up early error message output "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>
Andrew Dunstan writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I think offhand that the correct semantics of the flag are "we have >> redirected our original stderr into a pipe for syslogger", > We could expose syslogger's redirection_done flag, which I think has the > semantics you want. Yeah, that would work. You'd have to get rid of the current ad-hoc method by which it is propagated to the syslogger child process (EXEC_BACKEND case), because now it will have to be propagated to all children; so postmaster.c should handle it in BackendParameters. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления