Re: WORM and Read Only Tables (v0.1)
От | Csaba Nagy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WORM and Read Only Tables (v0.1) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1197378450.14272.82.camel@PCD12478 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WORM and Read Only Tables (v0.1) (Hannu Krosing <hannu@skype.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: WORM and Read Only Tables (v0.1)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 14:58 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, T, 2007-12-11 kell 13:44, kirjutas Csaba Nagy: > >> Then put the active chunk on a high performance file system and the > > archive tablespace on a compressed/slow/cheap file system and you're > > done. Allow even the archive chunk to be updateable, and put new tuple > > data in the active chunk. It would work just fine for cases where the > > old data is rarely updated/deleted... > > You can't update a table on a read-only (write-once) partition, at least > not with current header structure. OK, but that's what I'm challenging, why do you need a write once partition ? You mean by that tapes ? OK, it means I was thinking in completely different usage scenarios then... Cheers, Csaba.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: