Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply?
| От | |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1169757287.14369.9.camel@sakai.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply? (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
<blockquote type="CITE"><pre> <font color="#000000">> Some years ago there was discussion of consistently P-ifying *all* those</font> <font color="#000000">> macros, but it didn't get done; I think Thomas or somebody objected that</font> <font color="#000000">> it would make gram.y needlessly harder to read.</font> <font color="#000000">Are there many people who read gram.y on a regular base?</font> </pre></blockquote><br /> I can't seem to put it down :-)<br /><br /> >From the back cover:<br /><blockquote> A rollercoasterride of passion, heart-stopping adventures, and gut-wrenching laughs ... every bit as thrilling as copyfuncs.c,more of a tearjerker than bufmgr.c, and as deliciously naughty as MySQL's item.cc. <br /></blockquote><br />Get <i><b>gram.y</b></i>, in stores now (or order at Amazon.com, delivered in a plain brown wrapper).<br /><br /><br /> -- Korry
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: