Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1167201560.20456.3.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in the
> documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed yet). Given this
> patch came from userland, istm people are comfortable enough with this
> terminology there is no need to change it.
+1
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: