Re: x206-x225
От
Joost Kraaijeveld
Тема
Re: x206-x225
Дата
Msg-id
1142087174.6634.32.camel@localhost
Ответ на
Re: x206-x225 (PFC)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
x206-x225 "H.J. Sanders" <hjs@rmax.nl>
Re: x206-x225 Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: x206-x225 Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
Re: x206-x225 David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Re: x206-x225 Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
Re: x206-x225 PFC <lists@peufeu.com>
Re: x206-x225 Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
Re: x206-x225 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: x206-x225 Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl>
Re: x206-x225 David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Re: x206-x225 "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Re: x206-x225 Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: x206-x225 "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>
Re: x206-x225 Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>
Re: x206-x225 "Daniel Blaisdell" <lunk.djedi@gmail.com>
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 12:33 +0100, PFC wrote: > >> each transaction requires a sync to the disk, a sync requires a real > >> write (which you then wait for), so you can only do one transaction per > >> rotation. > > Not according to a conversation I had with Western Digital about the > > > It depends if you consider that "written to the disk" means "data is > somewhere between the OS cache and the platter" or "data is writter on the > platter and will survive a power loss". > > Postgres wants the second option, of course. I assume that for PostgreSQL "written to disk" is after fsync returned successfully. In practice that could very well mean that the data is still in a cache somewhere (controller or harddisk, not in the OS anymore, see also man page of fsync) -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl web: www.askesis.nl
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления