Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PGUpgrade WAS: Audio interview
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PGUpgrade WAS: Audio interview |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1139432334.3646.2.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PGUpgrade WAS: Audio interview (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-02-08 kell 15:51, kirjutas Tom Lane: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> This would be a very fine project for someone to pick up (maybe one of > >> the corporate supporters could sponsor someone to work on it?) > > > We looked at it for Greenplum but just couldn't justify putting it near > > the top of the priority list. The work/payoff ratio is terrible. > > I agree that doing pgupgrade in full generality is probably not worth > the investment required. However, handling the restricted case where > no changes are needed in user tables or indexes would be considerably > easier, and I think it would be worth doing. How hard would it be to modify postgres so that it can handle multiple heap page formats ? This could come handy for pgupgrade, but my real interest would be to have several task-specific formats supported even in non-upgrade situations, such as a more compact heap page format for read-only archive/analysis tables. -------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: