On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > There are a few issues with current FSM implementation, IMHO, discussing
> > as usual the very highest end of performance:
>
> Do you have any evidence that the FSM is actually a source of
> performance issues, or is this all hypothetical?
This was a side-bar issue for my current focus, as I already said, so
I'll skip what sounds like a lengthy debate on this for now.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs