Re: RETURNS SETOF primitive returns results in parentheses

On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 15:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mario Splivalo  writes:
> > Wo-ha, makes perfect sense. So, I'd go by with declaring the rec as
> > varchar, instead as of a record. Wich is what I should do in the first
> > place.
> 
> Or just return the correct field out of it.
> 
> 	RETURN NEXT returnValue.fieldname;
> 
> I think you may have to do it this way because the FOR loop wants a
> record variable.

Yes, you're right. Funny implementation of the FOR loop :)
Mike