Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?
| От | tony |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1110557996.3655.42.camel@hush обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Le vendredi 11 mars 2005 à 16:51 +0100, Magnus Hagander a écrit : > Do *not* do this with a production database. > > Vmware does *not* correctly handle fsync()s (or O_SYNC or any of those) > thruogh to disk. If your host PC crashes, your database will almost > certainly be corrupted. fsync() on the client just puts it in the RAM > cache on the host. Not even in the write cache on the disk/raid. Putting Windows NT inside a virtual machine (VMware workstation) solved all hardware stability problems in my case. NT would only crash if we forgot to reboot every 45 days or so... The Linux host had a 9 month uptime at one point. If you could be more explicit as to why VMware client does not write to disk I would much appreciate. I was thinking of virtualising a couple of servers (Linux client on Linux host). TIA Tony Grant
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: