On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 23:43, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> David Garamond wrote:
> > >>Now suppose /disk1 fails, one of the shadow can be configured to
> > >>immediately take over as the master database, without any down time. We
> > >>can then add /disk4/dbname.fdb, for instance, to become a new shadow.
> > >>
> > >>Alternatively, when a shadow fails, IB/Firebird can refuse further
> > >>transactions until there is another shadow coming up, so the database is
> > >>shadowed all the time.
> > >
> > > No, we don't have plans to do that. We will allow continuous logging so
> > > a tar backup plus this log will bring you up to current.
> >
> > What about the future synchronous replication or clustering? Will this
> > feature do what shadowing in IB/FB does? Cause I've met a couple of
> > people that really love this feature and they cling to FB because of this.
> >
> > Actually, what is needed is:
> >
> > - an exact mirror at all times;
> > - a very simple, straightforward, and fast way to failover;
> >
> > done by software.
>
> I recommend they keep clinging. :-)
>
Should we recommend they submit a patch instead? :-)
Seriously though this sounds like it could be an extension of the
tablespaces implementation couldn't it?
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL