Re: Typo

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Typo
Дата
в 04:25:27
Msg-id
1048164.1684902327@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Typo (Laurenz Albe)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Typo PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: Typo Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Typo "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Re: Typo Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Re: Typo Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Typo "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Laurenz Albe  writes:
> On Wed, 2023-05-24 at 07:32 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> This is the current sentence, and it sounds kind of OK to me, FWIW:
>> "Postgres95 code was completely ANSI C and trimmed in size by 25%.

> That uses "ANSI C" as an adjective, which I think is sloppy wording
> (even though English is somewhat relaxed about the distinction between
> classes of words).

Yeah, it's not great English, but it's not awful English either;
just a rather telegraphic (abbreviated) style.

Here's the thing: at this point, this documentation is itself a
historical artifact.  git excavation dates the current wording to
8baa8fcf4 of 1999-06-21, and that was just a small adjustment of
c8cfb0cea of 1998-03-01, and it seems likely that that was pulled
verbatim from some older source.

So I'm disinclined to change it on grounds of "I think the grammar
is a bit shaky".  It is what it is.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Typo
От: David G. Johnston
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Typo
FAQ