Re: next value expression
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: next value expression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1038421219.7588.47.camel@tokyo обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: next value expression (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: next value expression
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 12:24, Tom Lane wrote: > I would think his point is that the above paragraph specifies behavior > that is very definitely NOT like Postgres'. Ah, I see now -- yeah, I misunderstood. > > I submitted a patch for 7.4 that adjusts the > > CREATE SEQUENCE grammar to match SQL2003's CREATE SEQUENCE a little more > > closely, > > Did we apply it? I'm inclined not to, until we nail down the semantic > implications a little more. Conforming to the spec on syntax when we > don't on semantics strikes me as a bad idea. I agree, although the patch has already been applied. There's already a need to reform the way in which the next value of a sequence is produced (nextval() makes it difficult to get the dependancy information right); would it be a good idea to change it to be completely SQL compatible at the same time? Cheers, Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: