Re: pg_dump output portability
От
Rod Taylor
Тема
Re: pg_dump output portability
Дата
Msg-id
1029366721.93691.0.camel@jester
Ответ на
Re: pg_dump output portability (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
pg_dump output portability Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: pg_dump output portability Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
Re: pg_dump output portability Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump output portability Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump output portability Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: pg_dump output portability Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump output portability Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: pg_dump output portability Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump output portability Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Re: pg_dump output portability Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 18:20, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > I will vote against this as being a major loss of legibility. Perhaps > > > we could compromise on controlling it by a GUC variable, though. > > > > I was afraid of that, but to pick up the theme of the day, I'm not sure if > > I want to overcomplexify things that much. ;-) > > Tomorrow's theme is "sharing". :-) Brought to you by the letters S, Q, L and the number 99.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
