RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
От | Tsunakawa, Takayuki |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1FD334B8@G01JPEXMBYT05 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority (Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant [mailto:alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org] > Testing protocol version 2 is difficult! Almost every single test fails > because of error messages being reported differently; and streaming > replication (incl. pg_basebackup) doesn't work at all because it's not > possible to establish replication connections. Manual inspection shows > it behaves correctly. Yeah, the code path for protocol v2 is sometimes annoying. I wish v2 support will be dropped soon. I know there was a discussionon it, but I didn't track the conclusion. > Remaining patchset attached (per my count it's v13 of your patchset. I'm afraid those weren't attached. > think we should merge one half of it with each of the other two patches > where the changes are introduced (0003 and 0004). I'm not convinced > that we need 0004-0006 to be separate commits. It was hard to review those separate patches, so I think it's better to merge those. OTOH, I can understand Haribabu-san'sidea that the community may not accept the latter patches, e.g. accept only 0001-0005. Regards Takayuki Tsunakawa
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: