RE: Fuzzy matching?
От | Jeff Eckermann |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Fuzzy matching? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 08CD1781F85AD4118E0800A0C9B8580B094B72@NEZU обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Fuzzy matching? ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
With version 7.2 we will have pl/perlu (untrusted), which will allow use of the various Perl modules which do this sort of thing. > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Berkus [SMTP:josh@agliodbs.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 1:16 PM > To: Joe Conway; Bruce Momjian > Cc: Josh Berkus; pgsql-sql@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: Fuzzy matching? > > Joe, > > > In any case, metaphone is reportedly more accurate (at least for > > English > > words) than soundex, and levenshtein offers an entirely different and > > interesting approach. Any interest in having all three of these in > > the > > backend? > > I'm quite interested, myself. How difficult is it for somebody that > doesn't program C to attach a function from the Contrib directory? If > it's not very difficult, then I'd recommend putting metaphone in > /contrib, and levenstein in the backend. My reasoning is that > levenstein is useful for all roman alphabets, but metaphone is not so > useful for non-english versions of postgres. > > -Josh > > ______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________ > Josh Berkus > Complete information technology josh@agliodbs.com > and data management solutions (415) 565-7293 > for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533 > and non-profit organizations. San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: