Re: Win32 and fsync()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Dave Page
Тема
Re: Win32 and fsync()
Дата
Msg-id
03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259BC7@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Win32 and fsync() "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
Re: Win32 and fsync() Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew@dunslane.net] 
> Sent: 03 February 2003 22:47
> To: PostgreSQL Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 and fsync()
> 
> 
> I'm having difficulty digging up the reference, but I think I 
> recall seeing something that said, roughly, on W32 there are 
> 2 sets of buffers - those in the user level library and those 
> in the kernel level driver, and FlushFileBuffers drains the 
> first, while _commit drains both (it includes a call to 
> FlushFileBuffers).
> 
> I'm also fairly sure I saw something like
>     #define fsync _commit
> in the Berkeley DB sources the other day, which might be a clue.
> 
> I'll be happy to be corrected, though.

I too have yet to look at the Win32 patces, but if they have used
FlushFileBuffers, perhaps that would explain my powerfail test
results...

Regards, Dave.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Win32 and fsync()
FAQ