Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paesold
Тема Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Дата
Msg-id 017501c5b8fc$25c4efe0$0f01a8c0@zaphod
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> But the cmpb instruction in the 8.0 version of TAS would have done that,
> and I think we've already established that the cmpb is a loss on most
> machines (except maybe single-physical-CPU Xeons).

Note that this was a regular Pentium 4 system, not a Xeon.

Best Regards,
Michael Paesold


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Michael Paesold"
Дата:
Сообщение: Bug with cursor declaration in plpgsql? (Repost)
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches