Re: dlgOperator_patch

Hi Dave.

This is patch of pga3.
Please Apply it.

pga2 is thought to want to adjust it tonight.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

From: "Dave Page" 
> > This is one that is not in pga2 - any ideas?
> 
> MERGES is specified tacitly.
> Default name in the preparation is put.
> I don't think that it is a problem that it doesn't have 
> chkbox. 

I think it has as much right to be there as HASHES, however whilst there
is a oprcanhash column in pg_operator, there is no oprcanmerge column.
So what defines a mergeable operator?

> However, are LTCMP, GTCMP necessary?

Yes, I think so. You can specify them when you create an operator (they
are shown as < operator and > operator btw.).

Regards, Dave.