Best hardware
От | Bernd Jagla |
---|---|
Тема | Best hardware |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 002701c56909$a5491720$0300a8c0@JAGLABLAPTOP обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Best hardware
Re: Best hardware |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi there, And sorry for bringing this up again, but I couldn't find any recent discussion on the best hardware, and I know it actually depends on what you are doing... So this is what I had in mind: Our database is going to consist of about 100 tables or so of which only a hand full will be really big, say in the 100 of million rows, fully indexed and we are going to add a lot of entries (n* 100 000, n<100) on a daily bases (24/5). So from my experience with MySql I know that it is somewhat hard on the I/O, and that the speed of the head of the HD is actually limitiing. Also, I only experimented with RAID5, and heard that RAID10 will be good for reading but not writing. So I wanted to go whith RAIDKing. They have a 16 bay Raid box that they fill with Raptors (10krpm,73 GB, SATA), connected via FC. Now I am not sure what server would be good or if I should go with redundant servers. Are Quad CPUs any good? I heard that the IBM quad system is supposed to be 40% faster than HP or Dell???. And how much RAM should go for: are 8GB enough? Oh, of course I wanted to run it under RedHat... I would appreciate any sugestions and comments or if you are too bored with this topic, just send me a link where I can read up on this.... Thanks a lot for your kind replies. Bernd Bernd Jagla, PhD Associate Research Scientist Columbia University
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: