Re: PL/java
От
Adrian Klaver
Тема
Re: PL/java
Дата
Msg-id
fa245ee6-4f34-dce8-e5f1-a764b0eaae30@aklaver.com
Ответ на
Re: PL/java (Rob Sargent)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
PL/java Zé Rui Marques <ze.rui.marques@carrotincentives.com>
Re: PL/java Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Re: PL/java Zé Rui Marques <ze.rui.marques@carrotincentives.com>
Re: PL/java Hemil Ruparel <hemilruparel2002@gmail.com>
Re: PL/java Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Re: PL/java Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
Re: PL/java Martin Gainty <mgainty@hotmail.com>
Re: PL/java David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>
Re: PL/java Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>
Re: PL/java Thomas Kellerer <shammat@gmx.net>
Re: PL/java Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Re: PL/java Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
On 12/7/20 8:16 AM, Rob Sargent wrote: > > On 12/7/20 8:25 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 12/7/20 7:18 AM, Hemil Ruparel wrote: >>> I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like >>> Java is not meant to interact with databases. >> >> The JDBC folks might disagree. >> > That interaction is strictly sql to db, data to app. As it should be. Playing Devil's advocate. It is still Java interacting with a database. The objection I gather is to having Java embedded in the database. SQL interaction is no panacea: https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/sql-injection -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
