Re: PL/java

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hemil Ruparel
Тема Re: PL/java
Дата
Msg-id CANW1aT-9E4qQ_1GG0mujYzZeZZZkU5MFs+tkzHXd5UKitpoHbQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PL/java  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Ответы Re: PL/java
Список pgsql-general
I want to say this. I never liked any extension language. It's like Java is not meant to interact with databases. Nor is python (in my opinion). I think you should skip the search

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:15 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 12/7/20 3:25 AM, Zé Rui Marques wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am the lead architect in a small firm that develops a very specialised
> ETL platform.
>
> Traditionally, we have used Oracle and PL-SQL, and we are now porting
> everything to Postgres.
>
> All of our code outside of the database is java and I wiash that all of
> our code within the database to be also in java.
>
> The PL/java “add-on” is not supported directly by Postgres.
>
> I would like to ask if there is a plan to include it as an official
> procedural language. If so, when?

None that I have heard of. Even if the decision where to made today it
would likely a couple of years before it would be included, so that is
not going to help you. What is your concern?

>
> Thanks,
> *—*
> *Zé Rui Marques*
>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/java
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/java