Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
От
David Boreham
Тема
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
Дата
Msg-id
509A65F5.2020306@boreham.org
Ответ на
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? (Devrim GÜNDÜZ)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
On 11/7/2012 6:37 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote: > HT should be good for file servers, or say many of the app servers, or > small web/mail servers. PostgreSQL relies on the CPU power, and since > the HT CPUs don't have the same power as the original CPU, when OS > submits a job to that particular HTed CPU, query will run significantly > slow. To avoid issues, I would suggest you to turn HT off on all > PostgreSQL servers. If you can throw some more money, another 6-core CPU > would give more benefit. I realize this is the "received knowledge" but it is not supported by the evidence before me (which is that I get nearly 2x the throughput from pgbench using nthreads == nhtcores vs nthreads == nfullcores). Intel's latest HT implementation seems to suffer less from the kinds of resource sharing contention issues seen in older generations. Once I have the machine's full memory installed I'll run pgbench with HT disabled in the BIOS and post the results.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления