Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
От
David Boreham
Тема
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
Дата
Msg-id
509A631F.2010507@boreham.org
Ответ на
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? (Mark Kirkwood)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? Shaun Thomas <sthomas@optionshouse.com>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>
On 11/6/2012 9:16 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > > > I've been benchmarking a E5-4640 (4 socket) and hyperthreading off > gave much better scaling behaviour in pgbench (gentle rise and flatten > off), whereas with hyperthreading on there was a dramatic falloff > after approx number clients = number of (hyperthreaded) cpus. The box > is intended to be a pure db server, so we are running with > hyperthreading off. It looks like this syndrome is not observed on my box, likely due to the much lower number of cores system-wide (12). I see pgbench tps increase nicely until #threads/clients == #cores, then plateau. I tested up to 96 threads btw. We're waiting on more memory modules to arrive. I'll post some test results once we have all 4 memory banks populated.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления