Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3c86885b0facc66eede94113123c1c3be39837fe.camel@j-davis.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Non-superuser subscription owners (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 15:35 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 1:01 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 12:27 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > > For Update/Delete, we do read the table first via
> > > FindReplTupleInLocalRel(), so is there a need to check ACL_SELECT
> > > before that?
> >
> > If it's logically an update/delete, then I think ACL_UPDATE/DELETE
> > is
> > the right one to check. Do you have a different opinion?
> >
>
> But shouldn't we do it the first time before accessing the table?
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning. Are you saying that, to logically
replay a simple DELETE, the subscription owner should have SELECT
privileges on the destination table?
Is there a way that a subscription owner could somehow exploit a DELETE
privilege to see the contents of a table on which they have no SELECT
privileges? Or is it purely an internal read, which is necessary for
any ordinary local DELETE/UPDATE anyway?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: