Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?

On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 08:32:21AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> I've used both -f & --filenode in the test to check that the renaming was
> ok. I have reordered the options in the documentation so that they appear in
> alphabetical order, as for some reason --progress was out of it.

No objection to clean up this at the same time.

+     
+      
+      
+      
+       
+        Only validate checksums in the relation with specified relation file node.
+       
Two nits.  I would just have been careful about the number of
characters in the line within the  markup.  And we use
extensively "filenode" in the docs.  So the description would become
as follows:
Only validate checksums in the relation with filenode
filenode.

+       [ 'pg_checksums', '--enable', '-filenode', '1234', '-D', $pgdata ],
This fails, but not for the reason it is written for.

It looks strange to not order --filenode alphabetically in --help.

With all these issues cleaned up, I got the attached.  Does that look
fine?  (I ran pgperltidy and pgindent on top of it.)
--
Michael