Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?
Дата
Msg-id CBC19466-EDA3-4E10-9FC6-F293004D32EB@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Why does pg_checksums -r not have a long option?  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> On 27 May 2019, at 03:52, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> pg_verify_checksums has been using -r for whatever reason, but as we
> do a renaming of the binary for v12 we could just fix that
> inconsistency as well.

The original patch used -o in pg_verify_checksums, the discussion of which
started in the below mail:

https://postgr.es/m/20180228194242.qbjasdtwm2yj5rqg%40alvherre.pgsql

Since -f was already used for “force check”, -r ended up being used.  Now that
there no longer is a -f flag in pg_checksums, it can be renamed.

cheers ./daniel


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Excessive memory usage in multi-statement queries w/ partitioning
Следующее
От: Jan Chochol
Дата:
Сообщение: Fix order of steps in DISCARD ALL documentation