Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes
От
Manfred Koizar
Тема
Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes
Дата
Msg-id
ncuu809i4hk7bt2qd644mp79icsprdhbkv@email.aon.at
Ответ на
Updates not atomic with respect to indexes (Ben Young)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Updates not atomic with respect to indexes Ben Young <ben@transversal.com>
Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes "John Sidney-Woollett" <johnsw@wardbrook.com>
Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Updates not atomic with respect to indexes Ben Young <ben@transversal.com>
On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:33:34 +0100, Ben Young wrote: >UPDATE temp SET num = num+1; >ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "temp_num_key" >Is this [...] a known problem in Posgresql, Yes. > or bug which will be fixed sometime. Don't know. If you need a workaround for now, do it in two steps: UPDATE temp SET num = -num; UPDATE temp SET num = -num+1; This assumes you have a range of numbers that is normally not used. Servus Manfred
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления