Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dimitri Fontaine
Тема Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy
Дата
Msg-id m2ipgvh1k9.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Remember that we're talking about REASSIGN OWNED here, which will
> automatically reassign not only the extension itself, but also the
> contained objects.  There is no danger that we will end up with an
> inconsistent installation.  Also, if the objects in the extension have
> been manually given to someone else, they will stay owned by that other
> user, precisely because the code as written does not recurse.

Oh, right, I forgot the scope of the command. Given those bits of missed
context, +1 from me here. Sorry about missing that in my previous email.

Regards,
-- 
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug #6593, extensions, and proposed new patch policy
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Plan stability versus near-exact ties in cost estimates