Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures
Дата
Msg-id fb4d487d-3dd9-aa0f-ee01-c2effa0dbbc8@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures
Список pgsql-hackers
Updated patch attached.

I have addressed the most recent review comments I believe.

The question about what happens to cursor loops in PL/Perl and PL/Python
would be addressed by the separate thread "portal pinning".  The test
cases in this patch are currently marked by FIXMEs.

I have changed the SPI API a bit.  I got rid of SPI_set_nonatomic() and
instead introduced SPI_connect_ext() that you can pass flags to.  The
advantage of that is that in the normal case we can continue to use the
existing memory contexts, so nothing changes for existing uses, which
seems desirable.  (This also appears to address some sporadic test
failures in PL/Perl.)

I have also cleaned up the changes in portalmem.c further, so the
changes are now even smaller.

The commit message in this patch contains more details about some of
these changes.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pltcl valgrind output
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] static assertions in C++