Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions
От
Laurenz Albe
Тема
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions
Дата
Msg-id
fa456f80854a60819111518f187c5c446bf3e31e.camel@cybertec.at
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Prevent writes on large objects in read-only transactions Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 15:30 +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote: > Currently, lo_creat(e), lo_import, lo_unlink, lowrite, lo_put, > and lo_from_bytea are allowed even in read-only transactions. > By using them, pg_largeobject and pg_largeobject_metatable can > be modified in read-only transactions and the effect remains > after the transaction finished. Is it unacceptable behaviours, > isn't it? +1 Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата: