unreasonable run time for vacuum analyze?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Monarchi
Тема unreasonable run time for vacuum analyze?
Дата
Msg-id eea51fdb0706121704p2366a299uf1068bc2c28e9689@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: unreasonable run time for vacuum analyze?  (Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma@yahoo.com>)
Re: unreasonable run time for vacuum analyze?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-novice
Hello -

I'm running 8.2.3 on an 8-processor Linux box with a fiber-optic SAN.

One table in the database contains 22.6M rows of 71 fields with an average length of about 500 bytes.  The table is in BCNF.  The table is queried in a wide variety of ways.  There are 37 btree and Gin indexes defined on the table.  The GIN indexes are on array fields.  The rest are btree.

I started running vacuum analyze on this table over 44 hours ago, and it is still running.  The load on the machine has been modest.  There have been no times when all eight processors were being used.

1) is this amount of time reasonable?
2) if I abort the vacuum analyze, will I corrupt the table, its indexes, or the database?
3) are there parameters that I can set to improve the performance of the vacuum analyze process?

Thank you,
David

В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Richard Broersma Jr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: no results for nextval() query?
Следующее
От: Richard Broersma Jr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unreasonable run time for vacuum analyze?