Alex Turner wrote:
> As an aside note, I would consider a 13 disk RAID 5 a high risk
> solution. If you loose just two drives of 13 at the same time, your
> data is all gone. If you loose one drive, your array goes into degraded
> mode and your read and write performance goes to hell, and your machine
Well we have a hot standby disk.
> Second thing might be to post an explain analyze so that we can have a
> look at the query and see what's up. May be some of the tunning gurus
> can give good hints on things missing, like indexes and analyzingness,
> or general query structure.
Oh it is using indexes, but it is still painfully slow.