Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
| От | Gregory Maxwell |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | e692861c0610241056o3fa8dc1x5c1afea4d88ef297@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 (mark@mark.mielke.cc) |
| Ответы |
Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/24/06, mark@mark.mielke.cc <mark@mark.mielke.cc> wrote: > I wasn't aware that a system could protect against this. :-) > > I write 8 Kbytes - how can I guarantee that the underlying disk writes > all 8 Kbytes before it loses power? And why isn't the CRC a valid means > of dealing with this? :-) [snip] A file system with an apropreiate transaction method could do this.. In *theory* reiser4 write()s are atomic. No one has verified, however, that there is no torn page risk introduced in some other part of the kernel. I'm not aware of any other system which can guaranteed the atomicity of 8k writes.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: