Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Kreen
Тема Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings
Дата
Msg-id e51f66da0909231246m2cb4276aq3e147c098ea5fd32@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: [rfc] unicode escapes for extended strings  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 9/23/09, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 18:26 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > Unicode escapes for extended strings.
>
> Committed.

Thank you for handling the patch.


I looked at your code for U& and saw that you allow standalone
second half of the surrogate pair there, although you error
out on first half.  Was that deliberate?

Standalone surrogate halfs cause headaches for anything that wants to
handle data in UTF16.  The area 0xD800-0xDFFF is explicitly reserved
for UTF16 encoding and does not contain any valid Unicode codepoints.

Perhaps pg_verifymbstr() should be made to check for such values,
because even if we fix the escaping code, such data can still be
inserted via plain utf8 or \x escapes?

-- 
marko


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Следующее
От: Stef Walter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_hba.conf: samehost and samenet [REVIEW]