Re: JSONPATH documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Liudmila Mantrova
Тема Re: JSONPATH documentation
Дата
Msg-id deef0e68-ef0b-80f3-9359-a493f2be4575@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: JSONPATH documentation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: JSONPATH documentation  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 9/25/19 12:08 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-09-23 00:03, Tom Lane wrote:
>> While we're whining about this, I find it very off-putting that
>> the jsonpath stuff was inserted in the JSON functions section
>> ahead of the actual JSON functions.  I think it should have
>> gone after them, because it feels like a barely-related interjection
>> as it stands.  Maybe there's even a case that it should be
>> its own <sect1>, after the "functions-json" section.
> I'd just switch the sect2's around.

As more SQL/JSON functionality gets added, I believe a separate sect1 is 
likely to be more justified. However, for v12 I'd vote for moving sect2 
down. The patch is attached, it also fixes the ambiguous sentence that 
has raised questions in this thread.

-- 
Liudmila Mantrova
Technical writer at Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Muhammad Usama
Дата:
Сообщение: Proposal for syntax to support creation of partition tables whencreating parent table
Следующее
От: Anastasia Lubennikova
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.