Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql

On 3/31/21 4:17 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

 > Is it better to add FREEZE to the first "VACUUM reloptions_test;" as 
well?

I don't think this matters much, as it tests the contrary and the 
probability of
successful test passing (in case of theoretical bug making vacuum to 
truncate
non-empty relation) becomes stunningly small. But adding it wouldn't hurt
either.

-- cheers, arseny