Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Дата
Msg-id d15a8373-dbd5-3e56-644e-48755f555689@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Keith Fiske <keith@omniti.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi Kieth,

On 2017/01/10 14:44, Keith Fiske wrote:
> Is there any reason for the exclusion of parent tables from the pg_tables
> system catalog view? They do not show up in information_schema.tables as
> well. I believe I found where to make the changes and I tested to make sure
> it works for my simple case. Attached is my first attempt at patching
> anything in core. Not sure if there's anywhere else this would need to be
> fixed.

That's an oversight.  The original partitioning patch didn't touch
information_schema.sql and system_views.sql at all.  I added the relkind =
'P' check in some other views as well, including what your patch considered.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal