Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexey Bashtanov
Тема Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans
Дата
Msg-id c9388a48-3644-8be1-d5e2-bf2306dca369@imap.cc
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans  (Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>)
Ответы Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: improve transparency of bitmap-only heap scans  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello,

> It took me a while to figure out what those names mean.  "unfetched",
> as you call it on the code, may be more descriptive than "avoided" for
> the new label.  However I think the other two are more confusing.  It
> may be a good idea to change them together with this.
It'll be sad if this patch is forgotten only because of the words choice.
I've changed it all to "unfetched" for at least not to call the same 
thing differently
in the code and in the output, and also rebased it and fit in 80 lines 
width limit.

Best, Alex

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assumptions about the number of parallel workers
Следующее
От: Ashutosh Bapat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Erase the distinctClause if the result is unique by definition